磁浮由油精
0
最近看了車展!在大會中有很多都在介紹<br>油精,廠牌也非常的多,也一一的測試給名位觀看,大家看的目瞪口呆@@@直呼怎麼可能如此神奇呢??<br>所以小弟我很想請教可位前輩_車子若有定期保養,那麼有再花錢在油精上嗎??<br>又其效果能有多強呢??<br>
#2
0
好多好多人都在想油精有沒有用? 那些實驗真的讓引擎生命延長了. 我剛去查了一下資料, 發現有人做過這一方面的報告了. 網址在: http://www.vtr.org/maintain/oil-additives.html
以下是一點結語轉述:
In addition, all of the major vehicle and engine manufacturers spend millions of dollars each year trying to increase the longevity of their products, and millions more paying off warranty claims when their products fail. Again, it only stands to reason that if they thought any of these additives would increase the life or improve the performance of their engines, they would be actively using and selling them - or at least endorsing their use.
Instead, many of them advise against the use of these additives and, in some cases, threaten to void their warranty coverage if such things are found to be used in their products.
In any story of this nature, absolute "facts" are virtually impossible to come by. Opinions abound. Evidence that points one direction or the other is avail able, but has to be carefully ferreted out, and is not always totally reliable or completely verifiable.
In this environment, conclusions reached by known, knowledgeable experts in the field must be given a certain amount of weight. Conclusions reached by unknown, unidentifiable sources must be discounted almost totally. That which is left must be weighed, one side against the other, in an attempt to reach a "reasonable" conclusion.
<font color=red>In the case of oil additives, there is a considerable volume of evidence against their effectiveness. This evidence comes from well-known and identifiable expert sources, including independent research laboratories, state universities, major engine manufacturers, and even NASA. </font>
Against this rather formidable barrage of scientific research, additive makers offer not much more than their own claims of effectiveness, plus questionable and totally unscientific personal testimonials. Though the purveyors of these products state they have studies from other independent laboratories supporting their claims, they refuse to identify the labs or provide copies of the research. The only test results they will share are those from their own testing departments, which must, by their very nature, be taken with a rather large grain of salt.
以下是一點結語轉述:
In addition, all of the major vehicle and engine manufacturers spend millions of dollars each year trying to increase the longevity of their products, and millions more paying off warranty claims when their products fail. Again, it only stands to reason that if they thought any of these additives would increase the life or improve the performance of their engines, they would be actively using and selling them - or at least endorsing their use.
Instead, many of them advise against the use of these additives and, in some cases, threaten to void their warranty coverage if such things are found to be used in their products.
In any story of this nature, absolute "facts" are virtually impossible to come by. Opinions abound. Evidence that points one direction or the other is avail able, but has to be carefully ferreted out, and is not always totally reliable or completely verifiable.
In this environment, conclusions reached by known, knowledgeable experts in the field must be given a certain amount of weight. Conclusions reached by unknown, unidentifiable sources must be discounted almost totally. That which is left must be weighed, one side against the other, in an attempt to reach a "reasonable" conclusion.
<font color=red>In the case of oil additives, there is a considerable volume of evidence against their effectiveness. This evidence comes from well-known and identifiable expert sources, including independent research laboratories, state universities, major engine manufacturers, and even NASA. </font>
Against this rather formidable barrage of scientific research, additive makers offer not much more than their own claims of effectiveness, plus questionable and totally unscientific personal testimonials. Though the purveyors of these products state they have studies from other independent laboratories supporting their claims, they refuse to identify the labs or provide copies of the research. The only test results they will share are those from their own testing departments, which must, by their very nature, be taken with a rather large grain of salt.
#3
0
上面紅色部份內容翻譯如下(翻的不好請別見笑....)
以油精來說, 其實有很多證據可以證明它們的無效. 這些證明來自許多出名專業的團體, 包括了私立的實驗室, 洲立大學, 各大引擎製造商, 甚至美國太空總署.
所以.......我建議各位, 愛車就別亂操它, 平常使用夠水準的機油就好了.
以油精來說, 其實有很多證據可以證明它們的無效. 這些證明來自許多出名專業的團體, 包括了私立的實驗室, 洲立大學, 各大引擎製造商, 甚至美國太空總署.
所以.......我建議各位, 愛車就別亂操它, 平常使用夠水準的機油就好了.
#4
0
對ㄚ~~不要亂餵她任何(哩哩可可)的什麼怪東東ㄚ,平時保養多注意嗎,現在餵ㄌ改天沒餵~~~她會不爽喔,你也會不爽ㄉ啦
#5
0
我不會在新車就用油精,(少年人吃什麼補藥?)
我會在引擎上了年紀,但還不到搪缸的階段,用油精讓它"威而剛"!!!
我會在引擎上了年紀,但還不到搪缸的階段,用油精讓它"威而剛"!!!
#6
0
勤換機油最重要
有些油精和機油並不是很相容
反而會產生油泥
有些油精和機油並不是很相容
反而會產生油泥
